PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.59%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-3.36%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.36%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
6.88%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.76%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.34%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.86%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
3.83%
FCF growth of 3.83% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
17079.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 12170.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
176.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1398.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
87.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 420.01%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 188.01% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
59.14%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 59.14% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
24386.90%
Similar net income/share CAGR to BIDU's 24868.83%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
174.21%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2032.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
96.82%
Below 50% of BIDU's 927.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.31%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1049.85%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
100.37%
Below 50% of BIDU's 431.57%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.44%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-76.28%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.30%
Asset growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 7.11%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
5.78%
Under 50% of BIDU's 11.70%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
29.76%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
10.76%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 7.10%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-21.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.