PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.74%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 27.97%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
5.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 31.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-4.49%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.49%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.63%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 47.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.55%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 46.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 46.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.30%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.20%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.11%
OCF growth of 15.11% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
12.67%
FCF growth of 12.67% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
10348.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 15595.68%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
200.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1220.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
114.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 392.03%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
228.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 228.93% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
155.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 155.84% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
10971.47%
Below 50% of BIDU's 36520.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
186.43%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1796.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
81.58%
Below 50% of BIDU's 615.26%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.23%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1116.57%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
98.34%
Below 50% of BIDU's 425.41%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.50%
AR growth well above BIDU's 47.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1143.14%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.55%
Asset growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 14.21%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.56%
Under 50% of BIDU's 15.28%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
13.75%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 0.80%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
9.99%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 23.10%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
19.10%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 22.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.