PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.45%
Revenue growth similar to BIDU's 14.56%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
4.80%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 15.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-15.35%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 17.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.35%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 17.12%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-21.87%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.05%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.46%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.76%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.83%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.95%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
7551.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 19930.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
216.41%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1126.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
129.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 384.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 132.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
41.82%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 41.82% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
5055.90%
Below 50% of BIDU's 44154.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
93.09%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1511.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
28.19%
Below 50% of BIDU's 504.89%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.04%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1162.75%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
94.79%
Below 50% of BIDU's 434.03%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-2.52%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 23.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.28%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 14.50%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.62%
Under 50% of BIDU's 15.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 0.38%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
26.75%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 12.65%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.12%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 9.39%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.