PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.71%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.11%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.21%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.21%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.94%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
13.64%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
13.64%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.33%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.50%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.19%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-33.41%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
4118.73%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 17051.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
155.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 915.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
98.35%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 358.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
2317.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 2317.70% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
93.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 93.46% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
35.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 35.25% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
9577.61%
Below 50% of BIDU's 26932.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
142.57%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1261.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
64.65%
Below 50% of BIDU's 322.66%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
193.85%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1171.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
89.65%
Below 50% of BIDU's 435.39%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.99%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 3.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
28.32%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.09%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 4.75%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.89%
50-75% of BIDU's 8.52%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-7.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.49%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 15.55%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.31%
We cut SG&A while BIDU invests at 7.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.