PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.97%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 26.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.21%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 27.25%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-7.55%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 31.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.55%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 31.37%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.53%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 29.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.00%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 27.03%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 27.03%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.61%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.50%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.51%
OCF growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 46.65%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
27.33%
FCF growth under 50% of BIDU's 54.70%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
4586.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 21622.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
148.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 822.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
98.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 292.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
7500.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 7500.96% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
151.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 151.44% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
116.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 116.07% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
10275.24%
Below 50% of BIDU's 34820.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
144.25%
Below 50% of BIDU's 876.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
67.98%
Below 50% of BIDU's 214.11%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.21%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1145.53%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
85.90%
Below 50% of BIDU's 407.88%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 25.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-47.22%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 28.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.64%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 9.53%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.84%
Under 50% of BIDU's 10.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.17%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 16.17%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 27.12%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.