PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.59%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 17.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 18.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.54%
EBIT growth 50-75% of BIDU's 14.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
8.54%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 14.94%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-7.99%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-8.33%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 14.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 14.89%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.34%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.27%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-9.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
2823.20%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 28360.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
153.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 847.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
95.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 112.36%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
2877.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 2877.96% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
119.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 119.13% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
68.21%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 68.21% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
11384.17%
Below 50% of BIDU's 44694.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
116.87%
Below 50% of BIDU's 757.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of BIDU's 61.53%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
184.51%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1119.71%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
83.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 83.09% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.96%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 22.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-31.29%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 33.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.84%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 22.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.89%
Under 50% of BIDU's 11.71%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.17%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 51.21%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.51%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 15.80%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.97%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 28.42%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.