PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.19%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 7.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.08%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
4.28%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4.28%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.67%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
13.64%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
13.64%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.37%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.52%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
OCF growth of 3.05% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
6.76%
FCF growth of 6.76% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
2481.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 30332.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
177.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1155.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
90.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 112.20%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
4674.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 4674.90% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
131.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 131.42% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
41.95%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9702.48%
Below 50% of BIDU's 40652.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
727.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 976.54%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
26.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of BIDU's 35.16%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
11251.13%
Below 50% of BIDU's 36158.77%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
189.90%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1117.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
80.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 150.52%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.13%
AR growth well above BIDU's 1.78%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
81.28%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.57%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 11.01%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.82%
Under 50% of BIDU's 11.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.66%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 15.89%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
12.19%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 34.57%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.