PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.56%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.78%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
18.13%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.13%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
73.68%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
66.67%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
75.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.27%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x BIDU's 0.11%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.17%
OCF growth of 6.17% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-21.36%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1312.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 14671.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
153.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 121558.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
63.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 212.37%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
1291.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 1291.13% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
117.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.72% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
54.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1775.38%
Below 50% of BIDU's 33256.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
125.19%
Below 50% of BIDU's 34913.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
68.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 56.40%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
2770.71%
Below 50% of BIDU's 476892.32%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
171.23%
Below 50% of BIDU's 967.16%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
71.64%
Below 50% of BIDU's 235.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.28%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 22.52%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
373.84%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.26%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 9.25%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.47%
50-75% of BIDU's 9.12%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.95%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 16.59%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
15.11%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 30.53%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.