PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.03%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.71%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-14.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-14.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.02%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.38%
OCF growth of 19.38% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
21.21%
FCF growth of 21.21% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
666.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 11016.85%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
120.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 554.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 167.89%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
692.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 692.06% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
125.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 125.84% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
102.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 128.03%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
505.94%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5271.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
118.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 87.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
20.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
929.11%
Below 50% of BIDU's 7354.70%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
136.63%
Below 50% of BIDU's 771.94%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
57.41%
Below 50% of BIDU's 193.74%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 139.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.55%
Similar asset growth to BIDU's 1.55%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
2.71%
Similar to BIDU's 2.51%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-0.23%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.07%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-8.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.