PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.14%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 15.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.04%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 15.36%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
11.72%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 29.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
11.72%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 29.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.93%
Net income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 21.50%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
16.13%
EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 22.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 22.39%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.22%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.09%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
33.79%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
670.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 9055.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
123.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 438.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
47.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 143.81%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
854.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 854.43% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
143.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 143.49% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
87.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
494.98%
Below 50% of BIDU's 3865.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
82.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 48.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
46.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
742.21%
Below 50% of BIDU's 7133.79%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
131.09%
Below 50% of BIDU's 664.73%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
57.22%
Below 50% of BIDU's 174.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.97%
AR growth well above BIDU's 17.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.04%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 5.86%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.71%
Similar to BIDU's 3.71%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-19.30%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 11.91%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.12%
Our R&D shrinks while BIDU invests at 17.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.56%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 6.30%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.