PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 23.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.56%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 34.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-37.09%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 109.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.09%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 109.91%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-35.05%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 148.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-35.90%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 144.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-35.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 143.10%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.16%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.21%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.47%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 59.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-35.06%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 80.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
502.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 4990.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
100.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 285.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
58.97%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 76.03%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
439.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 439.77% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
64.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.10% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
28.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 28.29% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
241.60%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2944.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
19.26%
Below 50% of BIDU's 60.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
2.55%
Below 50% of BIDU's 25.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
576.41%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5942.09%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
115.95%
Below 50% of BIDU's 396.65%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
51.02%
Below 50% of BIDU's 124.53%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.71%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 29.61%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
42.14%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 7.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.39%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 8.30%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.14%
Under 50% of BIDU's 5.10%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.46%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.83%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 11.05%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.42%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 4.15%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.