PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.77%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 12.53%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 13.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
88.33%
EBIT growth above 1.5x BIDU's 11.64%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
88.33%
Operating income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 11.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
91.03%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 80.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
96.00%
EPS growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 113.38%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
92.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 113.48%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x BIDU's 0.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.35%
OCF growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 44.78%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
38.54%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
489.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 4539.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
86.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 278.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
64.15%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 75.57%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
442.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 442.86% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
133.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 189.19%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
60.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 60.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
464.86%
Below 50% of BIDU's 4189.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
192.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 166.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
140.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 107.24%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
570.46%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5879.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
118.36%
Below 50% of BIDU's 373.51%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
55.27%
Below 50% of BIDU's 127.23%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.71%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 15.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
92.21%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. BIDU's 263.41%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.11%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 9.59%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.80%
75-90% of BIDU's 7.26%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.23%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 13.38%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.79%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 2.99%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
0.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 27.68%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.