PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.09%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
411.29%
Net income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 60.95%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
409.09%
EPS growth above 1.5x BIDU's 51.28%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
404.55%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x BIDU's 50.32%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.08%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.52%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
13.38%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-27.14%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
441.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 3470.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
112.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 251.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
76.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 65.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
489.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 489.68% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
204.81%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
72.42%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
548.26%
Below 50% of BIDU's 4379.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
167.25%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 228.91%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
162.10%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 175.46%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
495.60%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5511.35%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
102.69%
Below 50% of BIDU's 341.30%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
45.33%
Below 50% of BIDU's 129.99%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-15.09%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 18548.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.89%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 7.05%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.37%
75-90% of BIDU's 6.20%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
33.59%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 16.08%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
17.02%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-7.34%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.