PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.41%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.76%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-4.89%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.65%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.03%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.54%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.08%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.42%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.69%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-25.50%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
522.21%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 3122.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
124.41%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 186.42%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
82.11%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 44.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
452.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 452.66% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
138.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 138.81% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
100.21%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 100.21% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2013.08%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 757.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
155.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
79.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
468.09%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5075.53%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
95.96%
Below 50% of BIDU's 325.19%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
45.98%
Below 50% of BIDU's 101.10%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.30%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8.66%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 14493.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.08%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 8.07%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.67%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.63%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.65%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 31.78%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
15.33%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 15.65%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
20.35%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 5.35%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.