PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.83%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.44%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.44%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-25.60%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-25.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.05%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.60%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
24.65%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
498.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 2837.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
128.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 154.52%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
77.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 50.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
384.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 384.02% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
164.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
324.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
86.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
56.54%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
457.74%
Below 50% of BIDU's 4949.54%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
93.63%
Below 50% of BIDU's 307.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
46.88%
Below 50% of BIDU's 96.96%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.12%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.39%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3.83%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.35%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.74%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
205.88%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 9.30%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.08%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.84%
We cut SG&A while BIDU invests at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.