PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.57%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 8.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
26.90%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 19.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
75.67%
EBIT growth similar to BIDU's 68.94%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
75.67%
Operating income growth similar to BIDU's 68.94%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
61.62%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 282.17%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
62.75%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 289.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
60.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 285.27%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.34%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.51%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
34.82%
FCF growth above 1.5x BIDU's 6.16%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
494.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 594.05%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
149.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 57.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.65%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 22.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
452.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 452.55% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
185.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 185.80% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
75.75%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
386.77%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 646.18%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
185.40%
Below 50% of BIDU's 393.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
70.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 75.70%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
361.29%
Equity/share CAGR of 361.29% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
84.95%
Below 50% of BIDU's 222.11%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
38.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 65.13%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.14%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.45%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.45%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.05%
Under 50% of BIDU's 8.12%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
68.98%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 0.30%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.28%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.72%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 6.41%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.