PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.23%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 7.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
23.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
39.58%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
39.58%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
35.39%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.14%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.57%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.42%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.37%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
48.30%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
538.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 600.64%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
171.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 66.11%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
80.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 32.60%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
509.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 85.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
259.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 259.77% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
126.95%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
467.15%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 160.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
214.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
618.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 28.41%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
355.85%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1137.54%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
88.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 133.65%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
49.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 63.48%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while BIDU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
23.01%
AR growth well above BIDU's 38.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-12.81%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 685.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.81%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 5.71%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
5.12%
Similar to BIDU's 5.35%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
0.77%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 6.70%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
2.42%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 24.31%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
16.57%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 8.38%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.