PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.78%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.28%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.02%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.02%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
17.75%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 395.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
17.70%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 397.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
16.96%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 390.43%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.35%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.13%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-22.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
516.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1096.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
178.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 82.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
83.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 39.32%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
480.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 480.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
157.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
71.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 71.00% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
852.54%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2382.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
335.18%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1227.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
96.85%
Below 50% of BIDU's 296.76%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
349.75%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2403.39%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
90.07%
Below 50% of BIDU's 187.11%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
47.61%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 91.10%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.19%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
21.98%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. BIDU's 101.85%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 14.02%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.72%
Under 50% of BIDU's 24.83%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.76%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 0.11%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
6.59%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-10.51%
We cut SG&A while BIDU invests at 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.