PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.23%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
5.17%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
8.63%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.63%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.22%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.90%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.94%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.48%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
14.19%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
550.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 668.08%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
199.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 74.65%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
101.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 13.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
527.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 527.67% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
167.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 167.94% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
102.07%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
573.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
286.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
115.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
333.02%
Equity/share CAGR of 333.02% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
88.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 139.18%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
50.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 33.00%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.93%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
40.90%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 1.14%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.58%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.44%
Positive BV/share change while BIDU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.72%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.25%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.80%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 28.26%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.