PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.67%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.91%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
4.06%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4.06%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.01%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 110.36%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.86%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 109.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 109.39%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.46%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.60%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.37%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 40.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-0.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
596.44%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to BIDU's 642.89%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
200.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 81.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
101.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 22.23%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
521.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 41.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
175.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 175.78% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
101.44%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
646.97%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
302.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
142.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
323.46%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1289.09%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
88.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 128.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
48.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 30.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.94%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 53.65%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-8.45%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.42%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.37%
Positive BV/share change while BIDU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.74%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
13.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 19.83%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
33.88%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.