PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.46%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 4.35%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
3.04%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 12.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-3.19%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 30.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.19%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 30.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.64%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 584.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-1.61%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 582.95%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 575.58%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.27%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.84%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.64%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 311.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.79%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 5255.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
465.46%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to BIDU's 446.20%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
181.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 41.74%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
88.65%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 13.41%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
352.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 352.71% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
175.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 11.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
469.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 31.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
377.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
69.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 51.86%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
291.14%
Below 50% of BIDU's 990.67%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
81.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 119.61%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
40.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 31.94%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.07%
AR growth well above BIDU's 4.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
44.63%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 1.58%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.54%
Negative asset growth while BIDU invests at 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.82%
Under 50% of BIDU's 1.97%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.08%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 4.29%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
7.92%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 12.20%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.83%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 2.75%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.