PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.07%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.31%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.98%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.98%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-2.06%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 1472.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.93%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 1423.08%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.94%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 1407.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.79%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.15%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.12%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-0.36%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
487.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 423.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
153.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 40.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
76.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 13.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
416.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 180.31%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
147.60%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
74.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
382.23%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 77.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
585.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 18.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
36.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
264.85%
Below 50% of BIDU's 760.18%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
80.83%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 93.31%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
35.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 35.52%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.28%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 45.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-15.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.80%
50-75% of BIDU's 3.08%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
2.62%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.06%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
16.65%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 13.25%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.