PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.80%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.27%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 20.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.27%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 20.42%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
7.19%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 28.23%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.28%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 29.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.64%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 28.81%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.69%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.94%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
3.78%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
446.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 285.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
151.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 21.16%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
79.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 17.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
539.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 539.72% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
156.71%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 18.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
603.17%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 118.01% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
136.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
249.18%
Below 50% of BIDU's 587.25%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
77.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 50.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
38.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 32.87%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.71%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
32.54%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 0.59%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.57%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.16%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.98%
1.25-1.5x BIDU's 2.50%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
6.33%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.86%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.