PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.29%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.84%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1.69%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.59%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
0.89%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.40%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.42%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.50%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.57%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.03%
Dividend reduction while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.41%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
40.82%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
491.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 145.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
135.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 17.80%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
38.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 3.32%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
582.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 582.49% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
205.43%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
70.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
519.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 62.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
180.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
39.33%
Below 50% of BIDU's 203.29%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
245.45%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 417.62%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
81.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 60.67%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
40.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 24.89%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.59%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 27.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.51%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.02%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.50%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.43%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 2.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.37%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 2.78%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.70%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 13.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.