PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.46%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.55%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
29.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 150.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-1.18%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 15.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
30.16%
Net income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 48.63%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
30.88%
EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 56.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
30.70%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 51.69%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.37%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while BIDU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.58%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-23.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
484.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 160.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
147.06%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 44.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
43.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 14.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
510.68%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
255.76%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
56.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
998.41%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 221.72% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
469.40%
Below 50% of BIDU's 18824.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
127.74%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1133.54%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
255.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 404.83%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
91.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 66.34%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
47.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 27.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.58%
Similar asset growth to BIDU's 6.13%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
6.60%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.45%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 28.65%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.35%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-17.48%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.