PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.86%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 16.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-18.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
2.17%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-18.37%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 334.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.96%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 334.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-17.79%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 335.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.50%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.76%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5.00%
Dividend growth of 5.00% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-23.24%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-72.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
513.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 310.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
183.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 217.57%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
50.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PINS's 46.66%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
347.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 424.98%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
123.05%
Below 50% of PINS's 592.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
55.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 69.25%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
708.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 166.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
355.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 133.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
91.41%
Below 50% of PINS's 188.03%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
265.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 265.94% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
96.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 118.78%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
54.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PINS's 50.13%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.94%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.61%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.64%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
50.90%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.86%
R&D dropping or stable vs. PINS's 8.43%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
26.76%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 22.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.