PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.81%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
23.12%
Gross profit growth similar to PINS's 21.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
46.23%
Positive EBIT growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
46.23%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of PINS's 87.79%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
80.89%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-34.09%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 334.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 335.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.58%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
4.93%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.88%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
25.31%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2378.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 310.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
2378.98%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 217.57%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
2378.98%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3724.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 166.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3724.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 133.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
3724.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 188.03%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.58%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.66%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
20.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-31.13%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-9.18%
Our R&D shrinks while PINS invests at 8.43%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
0.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 22.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.