PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.68%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 16.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.39%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-9.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-9.55%
Negative operating income growth while PINS is at 87.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.69%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 334.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-8.02%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 334.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.80%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 335.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.36%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.85%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.16%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
3381.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 310.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
3381.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 217.57%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
386.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
563.93%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 69.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
3765.32%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 166.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3765.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 133.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
929.57%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 188.03%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1600.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 50.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.62%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
52.30%
Inventory growth of 52.30% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.04%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
19.69%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 22.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.