PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.97%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 16.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.21%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-7.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.55%
Negative operating income growth while PINS is at 87.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.53%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 334.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.00%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 334.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 335.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.61%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.50%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.51%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
27.33%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
4586.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 310.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
148.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 217.57%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
98.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
7500.96%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 424.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
151.44%
Below 50% of PINS's 592.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
116.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 69.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
10275.24%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 166.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
144.25%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to PINS's 133.35%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
67.98%
Below 50% of PINS's 188.03%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 118.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
85.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 50.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while PINS shows 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-47.22%
Inventory is declining while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.84%
1.25-1.5x PINS's 2.58%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-2.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.17%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 22.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.