PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 16.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.56%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-37.09%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.09%
Negative operating income growth while PINS is at 87.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-35.05%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 334.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-35.90%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 334.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-35.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 335.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.16%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-35.06%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
502.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 310.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
100.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 217.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
58.97%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 46.66%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
439.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with PINS's 424.98%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
64.10%
Below 50% of PINS's 592.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
28.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 69.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
241.60%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 166.88%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
19.26%
Below 50% of PINS's 133.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
2.55%
Below 50% of PINS's 188.03%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
576.41%
Equity/share CAGR of 576.41% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
115.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with PINS's 118.78%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
51.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PINS's 50.13%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.71%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
42.14%
Inventory growth of 42.14% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.39%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 2.28%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
2.14%
75-90% of PINS's 2.58%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.46%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.83%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.42%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 22.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.