PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.77%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 16.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
88.33%
Positive EBIT growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
88.33%
Operating income growth similar to PINS's 87.79%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
91.03%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
96.00%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
92.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PINS's 0.07%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.35%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
38.54%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
489.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 310.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
86.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 217.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
64.15%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 46.66%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
442.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with PINS's 424.98%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
133.13%
Below 50% of PINS's 592.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
60.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 69.25%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
464.86%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 166.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
192.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 133.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
140.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PINS's 188.03%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
570.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 570.46% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
118.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with PINS's 118.78%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
55.27%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 50.13%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.71%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
92.21%
Inventory growth of 92.21% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.11%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.80%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.23%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.79%
R&D dropping or stable vs. PINS's 8.43%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
0.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 22.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.