PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.32%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 17.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.65%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 22.60%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
183.25%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PINS's 45.78%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
183.25%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PINS's 45.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
187.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x PINS's 50.86%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
186.96%
EPS growth above 1.5x PINS's 50.82%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
182.61%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PINS's 50.82%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.18%
Share change of 0.18% while PINS is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.09%
Diluted share change of 0.09% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.38%
OCF growth under 50% of PINS's 69.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
70.31%
FCF growth similar to PINS's 64.85%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
449.94%
10Y CAGR of 449.94% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
117.24%
5Y CAGR of 117.24% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
78.12%
3Y CAGR of 78.12% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
446.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 446.07% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
149.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 149.20% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
116.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 116.81% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
543.62%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 543.62% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
196.77%
Net income/share CAGR of 196.77% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
127.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 127.76% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
458.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 458.33% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
96.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 96.24% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
44.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 44.05% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.77%
AR growth of 4.77% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
73.64%
Inventory growth of 73.64% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.69%
Asset growth of 4.69% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.65%
BV/share growth of 4.65% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
0.13%
Debt growth of 0.13% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
2.31%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 3.14%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.33%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 2.96%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.