PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.19%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 15.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.40%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 19.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
7.67%
EBIT growth below 50% of PINS's 60.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.67%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 60.60%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-0.18%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 135.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.58%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.26%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.65%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-20.09%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
480.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 247.79%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
144.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 112.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
48.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 29.64%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
417.90%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 264.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
137.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 239.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
31.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
671.03%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 115.20% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
167.07%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 100.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
38.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
243.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 243.61% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
76.01%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 0.10%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
37.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 18.94%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.69%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PINS's 17.81%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Asset growth at 75-90% of PINS's 2.20%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.30%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.21%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.82%
R&D dropping or stable vs. PINS's 11.62%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
10.85%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 13.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.