PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.25%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.61%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.41%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4.41%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.41%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
0.70%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.04%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.14%
Slight or no buybacks while SNAP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.08%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.71%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
62.21%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
3036.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1054.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 155.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
207.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1259.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 214.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
195.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 169.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
3088.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
5195.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 30.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
196.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 39.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.57%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Firm’s AR is declining while SNAP shows 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.01%
Inventory growth of 18.01% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.58%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.88%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.28%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.88%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.