PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.26%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.81%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
25.48%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
25.48%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
39.32%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
35.71%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
35.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while SNAP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.94%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
14.02%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7718.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
244.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 155.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 214.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
94.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 169.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
9983.34%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
225.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 30.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
95.58%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 39.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
264.45%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
95.40%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.27%
AR growth well above SNAP's 0.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-52.19%
Inventory is declining while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.17%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.20%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
30.66%
We have some new debt while SNAP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.65%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
7.54%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.