PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.69%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.34%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
6.14%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.14%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.94%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.53%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.29%
Slight or no buybacks while SNAP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.43%
Slight or no buyback while SNAP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.25%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
25.67%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
5249.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
239.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 155.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
70.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
269.26%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 214.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
75.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 169.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
6458.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
249.37%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 30.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
105.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 39.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.56%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
94.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SNAP's 0.63%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
40.52%
Inventory growth of 40.52% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.52%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.16%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.05%
We have some new debt while SNAP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
13.78%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.11%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.