PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.23%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 34.28%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
23.00%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 36.36%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
39.58%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SNAP's 61.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
39.58%
Operating income growth similar to SNAP's 42.07%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
35.39%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 43.41%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
36.14%
EPS growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 44.93%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
36.59%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 45.57%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.57%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.42%
Reduced diluted shares while SNAP is at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.37%
OCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.16%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
48.30%
FCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.81%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
538.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1337.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
171.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1337.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
80.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 170.64%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
509.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 73.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
259.77%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 73.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
126.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 74.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
467.15%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 40.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
214.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 40.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
618.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 72.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
355.85%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 57.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
88.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 57.35%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
49.96%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SNAP invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
23.01%
AR growth well above SNAP's 40.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-12.81%
Inventory is declining while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.12%
75-90% of SNAP's 5.95%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.77%
Debt growth far above SNAP's 1.27%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
2.42%
R&D dropping or stable vs. SNAP's 12.27%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
16.57%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 16.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.