PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.67%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 21.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
12.91%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SNAP's 36.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.06%
EBIT growth below 50% of SNAP's 159.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.06%
Operating income growth under 50% of SNAP's 86.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.01%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 131.34%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.86%
EPS growth under 50% of SNAP's 121.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SNAP's 121.98%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.46%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.60%
Reduced diluted shares while SNAP is at 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.37%
Negative OCF growth while SNAP is at 159.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-0.90%
Negative FCF growth while SNAP is at 211.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
596.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1770.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
200.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 396.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
101.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 174.87%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
521.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 185.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
175.78%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to SNAP's 170.08%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
101.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 221.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
646.97%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 110.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
302.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 108.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
142.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 109.71%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
323.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 133.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
88.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 58.09%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
48.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 35.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.94%
AR growth well above SNAP's 17.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-8.45%
Inventory is declining while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.42%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 5.98%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.37%
Under 50% of SNAP's 8.54%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.74%
Debt growth far above SNAP's 1.16%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
13.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SNAP's 5.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
33.88%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 11.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.