PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
7.49%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.49%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
14.38%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.06%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.58%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.60%
Reduced diluted shares while SNAP is at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.51%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
113.22%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
465.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 11129.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
147.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 203.44%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
57.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 41.51%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
611.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 171.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
169.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 208.65%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
62.20%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
642.70%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
297.90%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 20.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
43.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 3.06%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
245.98%
Equity/share CAGR of 245.98% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
78.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
38.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 13.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.11%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.95%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.59%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-30.55%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.