PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.61%
Revenue growth above 1.5x TWLO's 4.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.04%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x TWLO's 3.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-36.06%
Negative EBIT growth while TWLO is at 45.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-36.06%
Negative operating income growth while TWLO is at 60.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.83%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 12.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.39%
Negative EPS growth while TWLO is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-17.39%
Negative diluted EPS growth while TWLO is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-24.95%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-26.21%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
106.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x TWLO's 45.04%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
121.21%
FCF growth above 1.5x TWLO's 47.77%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
171.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of TWLO's 1420.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
171.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TWLO's 183.24%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
171.62%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x TWLO's 54.97%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while TWLO is at 210.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-39.79%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while TWLO is 120.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-39.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while TWLO is 108.27%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
340.20%
We increase R&D while TWLO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.