PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of TWLO's 17.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.13%
Negative gross profit growth while TWLO is at 13.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-12.54%
Negative EBIT growth while TWLO is at 4.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.54%
Negative operating income growth while TWLO is at 4.48%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.26%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-16.00%
Negative EPS growth while TWLO is at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while TWLO is at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.29%
Share count expansion well above TWLO's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.27%
Diluted share count expanding well above TWLO's 0.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.52%
OCF growth under 50% of TWLO's 69.69%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
19.99%
FCF growth under 50% of TWLO's 68.76%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1554.24%
10Y CAGR of 1554.24% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
159.83%
5Y CAGR of 159.83% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
62.26%
3Y CAGR of 62.26% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1929.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 1929.07% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
105.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 105.56% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
44.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 44.85% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
4151.22%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 4151.22% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
56.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 56.23% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-4.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
2979.42%
Equity/share CAGR of 2979.42% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
173.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 173.94% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
72.03%
Equity/share CAGR of 72.03% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.41%
AR growth of 20.41% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-4.78%
Inventory is declining while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.43%
Asset growth of 3.43% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
2.90%
BV/share growth of 2.90% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
18.63%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TWLO's 30.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.11%
We expand SG&A while TWLO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.