PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
8.62%
ROE of 8.62% while BIDU has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
5.93%
ROA of 5.93% while BIDU has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
19.94%
ROCE of 19.94% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
51.60%
Gross margin 50-75% of BIDU's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
23.84%
Operating margin below 50% of BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
9.82%
Similar net margin to BIDU's 10.23%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.