PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
3.95%
Positive ROE while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
3.62%
Positive ROA while BIDU shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
5.98%
Positive ROCE while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
59.60%
Gross margin 50-75% of BIDU's 81.11%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
29.68%
Operating margin above 1.5x BIDU's 18.98%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s operations are uniquely productive.
19.40%
Similar net margin to BIDU's 19.62%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.