PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
4.82%
ROE of 4.82% while META has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
3.86%
ROA of 3.86% while META has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
5.05%
ROCE of 5.05% while META is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
64.86%
Gross margin 75-90% of META's 76.54%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
31.92%
Operating margin 50-75% of META's 45.47%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.
27.75%
Similar net margin to META's 26.82%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.