238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
4.98%
ROE of 4.98% while META has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
3.95%
ROA of 3.95% while META has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
5.08%
ROCE of 5.08% while META is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
65.25%
Gross margin 75-90% of META's 75.26%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
31.46%
Operating margin 50-75% of META's 43.40%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.
28.08%
Net margin 1.25-1.5x META's 23.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if cost savings or scale explain the difference.