PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
3.42%
ROE of 3.42% while SNAP has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
2.76%
ROA of 2.76% while SNAP has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
3.74%
ROCE of 3.74% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
62.32%
Positive margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see if this confers a decisive advantage.
25.21%
Positive operating margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
21.31%
Positive net margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.