PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
7.80%
Positive ROE while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
5.52%
Positive ROA while SNAP shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
6.92%
Positive ROCE while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
57.62%
Similar gross margin to SNAP's 54.69%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
31.29%
Positive operating margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
29.94%
Positive net margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.