PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
6.47%
Positive ROE while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
4.60%
Positive ROA while SNAP shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
6.81%
Positive ROCE while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
56.48%
Similar gross margin to SNAP's 60.39%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
29.55%
Positive operating margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
24.17%
Positive net margin while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.