PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.82%
Net income growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 876.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.76%
Some D&A expansion while E4C.DE is negative at -2.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Working capital change of 100.00% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while E4C.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-154.08%
Negative yoy while E4C.DE is 114.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-60.91%
Negative yoy CFO while E4C.DE is 512.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
56.99%
CapEx growth of 56.99% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-200.05%
Negative yoy acquisition while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.52%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. E4C.DE's 200.08%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-32.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with E4C.DE at -8.92%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
11.66%
Debt repayment growth of 11.66% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.