PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-62.10%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MZX.DE at -132.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
25.79%
D&A growth well above MZX.DE's 35.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
519.22%
Some yoy increase while MZX.DE is negative at -34.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
197.33%
Some CFO growth while MZX.DE is negative at -21.09%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.04%
Negative yoy CapEx while MZX.DE is 212.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
63.82%
Acquisition growth of 63.82% while MZX.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3228.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while MZX.DE is 126.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
47.39%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MZX.DE's 126.64%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
67.49%
We repay more while MZX.DE is negative at -29.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.